📷 Image Credits: The Indian Express
In a recent development, a Delhi court has dismissed the bail plea of former JNU student leader Umar Khalid in connection to the ‘larger conspiracy’ case related to the 2020 northeast Delhi riots. Khalid, who faces charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, argued for parity with bailed accused, stating that others facing graver allegations had already been granted bail by the court. However, the prosecutor opposed Khalid’s plea, highlighting concerns that bail recipients were stalling the trial to benefit those in custody. According to the prosecutor, Khalid’s actions were part of a pre-made plan, indicating his involvement in a conspiracy. The court emphasized the need to consider all events in the ‘conspiracy’ together and not in isolation. The prosecutor also presented evidence of Khalid’s social media interactions and efforts to influence bail hearings by creating social media narratives. Despite Khalid’s arguments that he had not committed any terrorist acts and lacked evidence against him, the court ruled against granting him bail. This decision comes after Khalid withdrew his bail plea before the Supreme Court earlier this year, citing a change in circumstances. Khalid has been in custody since his arrest in September 2020 in connection to the Delhi riots. The court’s rejection of his bail plea underscores the gravity of the charges against him and the complexity of the ongoing legal proceedings.
